Branch Consultants Whistleblower Case Reinstated- Appeal Court Decision February 2009/Also links to info on the Rigsby Whistleblower cases

February 23, 2009

We had previously written on this blog about the Branch Consultants case being dismissed in this prior blog entry on 10/17/07:

Here is another blog  on 3/28/08 we wrote about the appeal filed with links to many other blogs and news articles:

We have now learned the Appeal Court decision of February 09 has reinstated the case.

We have located some news coverage giving many more details to include a news link at State Farm who was now dismissed from the case commenting about the case. Some of these articles do include the names of which companies have been dismissed from the case and which insurance companies, adjusting firms, and software estimating companies are still named in this case.

 Here is a link to the news on State Farm’s Katrina news link:

Attorney Kanner who represents Branch Consultants has information up on the Qui Tam section of his website that contains information about numerous news articles that have been published on this case here:

For those who remember this case with the 4 unnamed whistleblower cases  (the news says they are PA’ s (public adjusters) filed under “Branch Consultants” who we never could find a website for, the Court of Appeals reopened the case this week. We did locate the name of one of the adjusters in a news article linked to in the first blog above (Max Johnson named in a news article):

Here is a blog post over at with links to the court documents from this week:

To see lots of blogs Slabbed has posted updating the status on the EA Renfroe/State Farm/Rigsby cases you can also view these- there are so many I don’t even try to post them all but many are interested in these cases:

And here is the news story with a good summary and update on the Branch Consultants RICO suit: (Note this names the carriers, 3 adjusting firms and software firms involved in this whistleblower case):

**Update 2/25/09:

***Update 3/1/09

Great article at National Underwriters P & C with information about State Farm and Allstate being dismissed from this case.

Cori Rigsby January 2008 Deposition- Hoped to Remain Anonymous -Let’s Compare

March 29, 2008

Attorney David Rossmiller  has posted a newer January 2008 deposition for Cori Rigsby taken after her loss of income from the Katrina Scruggs Group (now Katrina Litigation Group).

This should provide interesting weekend reading and comparision to an earlier deposition we’d posted taken in November prior to Scruggs indictment and all the events which have taken place. At the time of the earlier deposition, they were still being paid going into their second year.

I’ll post any interesting comparisons between the two if there are any major discrepancies between the two. See Rossmiller’s 3/28/2008 post (click here) for his comments regarding her January 08 testimony that she hoped to remain anonymous (hard to believe when her earlier deposition said she reported it to State Farm the day after the data dump weekend…also consider the number of associates they brought in to help with the data dump weekend). Here is a link to our prior blog on Rigsby’s earlier deposition if you want to read both for yourself to compare the two. Wouldn’t it be great to have a copy of ALL of the depositions they both have given (Kerri and Cori) and compare the details of ALL of the depositions? I’d volunteer my time to compare them all if anyone has links to all of them for viewing. There remains a big question as I believe Rossmiller points out as to when they began their relationship with Scruggs- December 2005 or February 2006 as they testified to although this differs with other info available. That would be a major development if they pin down the fact they have provided inaccurate information on the initial meeting dates as many suspect (two additional months of their access to files and documenting their allegations?)

So what do you think about this more current deposition? As an adjuster or adjusting firm, are you glad to see these whistleblowing sisters have lost their income they were getting at a time that many experienced claim adjusters and managers were without income after no major storms in 06/07 while the Rigsby’s were drawing 150K for little to no work as they testified to in earlier depositions? Do you agree or disagree with Rossmiller’s guess that the Rigsby’s careers are “radioactive” in the independent adjusting or staff adjusting/management field? How about as public adjusters should they make a decision to flip if they cannot get employment again on the independent/staff side of claims?

Branch Consultants Whistleblower Case- Appeal Filed on the Dismissed case

March 28, 2008

We had previously blogged about the Dismissal of the Whistleblower case filed by unknown adjusters under the Branch Consultants group. We have just located info over at FOLO that the Branch Consultant group has now filed an Appeal on the case. Here is a link to our former blog with all the details on this Whistleblower case alleging adjusters improperly filed claim damages under NFIP.

Here is a link to both the FOLO blog updating information on the Appeal and a link to the news article from yesterday over at with updated information on the appeal. We’ll provide a link to any additional news articles and to a pdf of the appeal filed as soon as we locate it.

Thank you all for your patience with the absence of new blogs recently as we finish the marathon of radiation treatments for my daughter’s tumor leading to my absence the past few weeks. We should finish up a week from today and are looking forward to a much improved recovery for her afterwards. We thank you all for your continued thoughts and prayers as we deal with this.

Branch Consultants vs Multiple Insurers and Adjusting Firms Whistleblower case thrown out by Judge today!

October 17, 2007

Here is breaking news on the Branch Consultant case which is the case involving 4 unnamed adjusters alleging under the False Claims Act that a multitude of carriers and multiple independent adjusting firms moved wind damages to the flood program improperly charging them with wind damages by attributing the damage to flood.

Here is the news article today on this case indicating the judge threw out the case.

Here is a 2nd article that came out tonight which reveals for the first time that I have seen in any articles the name of one of the adjusters:

“Kanner said that he believes that the only hope of a real investigation of possible overbilling of the National Flood Insurance Program is for someone in Congress to invite his key adjuster, Max Johnson, to testify about his findings and demand to know why the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security, which is in charge of the flood program through the Federal Emergency Management Agency, isn’t doing more. ” Read the rest of the linked article for additional comments by Branch’s attorney, Mr Kanner.

* Note this link above also discloses many more reasons why Judge Beer dismissed the case because of the Rigsby/Renfroe/State Farm case. Simply interesting for those of us in the adjusting community. This link is a must read. Also from this link you’ll see a list of the carriers and adjusting firms that were named in the suit but read farther down in my blog entry for the article that says Allied adjusting firm was the 5th adjusting firm also named in the suit:

“The Branch case involved Allstate Insurance Co., State Farm, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Fidelity National Insurance Co., Fidelity National Property and Casualty Insurance Co., American National Property and Casualty Co., American Reliable Insurance Co., Standard Fire Insurance Co., Pilot Catastrophe Services Inc., Crawford and Co., NCA Group Inc., Simsol Insurance Services Inc., and Colonial Claims Corp.

The Rigsby case was filed against State Farm, Allstate, Nationwide Insurance Co., USAA Insurance Co. , Forensic Analysis Engineering Corp., Exponent Failure Analysis, Haag Engineering Co., Jade Engineering, Rimkus Consulting Group Inc., Structure Group, Renfroe and several individuals.”

I hope Rossmiller’s blog  provides more in depth review of the activity today and links to the court documents. I’ll post more information as other news is released on this case.

Here you will find some links to a history of articles on the case and the court documents:

US Attorney won’t intervene in the case:

May Times- Piscayne article “Insurers accused of overbilling the federal Government”

June article (not part of this case but related) saying Government Accountability office (GAO) did not find problems alleged:

Just totally for the human interest of’s Kanner’s picture- the attorney who represented the whistleblowers:

Here’s Kanners profile/picture:

I found the Kanner Law firm website- note on his publications page he sites a forthcoming article on Property Damage Claims and Business Interruption losses. While there are links to many cases they have handled, I don’t find one for this suit:

Dr Michael Birzon’s of the University of Central FL’s earlier blog on the case:

The earlier articles above didn’t name the 5th adjusting firm but this article does list Allied as the 5th adjusting firm and goes into much more details on the fines:

We now have the 5th name in this National Underwriter article- Allied out of Ft Lauderdale:

There is much more in this article also about 8 billion in fraud and 11,000 fines,etc…

Here’s a 2nd article that listed Allied Adjusting:

Next was the important action in July 2007 by Judge Beer’s requesting the US Justice Department become involved:

I found the article specifying how much these whistleblowers stood to gain- here is what it says so if the federal government had gotten involved, they would get reduced fees but it would still be a huge windfall to these whistleblowers due to the extent alleged to be involved:

“If whistleblowers are successful in pursuing the suit without the U.S. attorney’s intervention, they could be awarded as much as 30 percent of the proceeds if the suit is victorious. If the U.S. attorney’s office decides later to take over the investigation and the effort is successful, the whistleblowers’ take is reduced to 15 percent to 25 percent of the proceeds, Dugas said, because the government is the one doing the heavy lifting.

Under the False Claims Act, anyone who knowingly submits fake bills to the government is liable for three times the amount of damages sustained by the government, according to the Branch suit. There is also a civil penalty. ”

It’s on page 4 of this 6 page story.

Here is a link to the original complaint filed:

Here was an article coming out of Mobile, AL quoting Pilot Catastrophe Services attorney on the case:

Congressman Gene Taylor’s website comments on the allegations of carrier abuse:

Another June article out of LA on the reliance on private insurers involved in flood:

This July Claims Journal article advised Scottsdale Insurance had been dropped from the suit:

Here was a July article quoting several other carriers involved in the suit: wrote a July 9, 2007 article which said in part that the request for Justice Dept involvement was withdrawn ( link is no longer working but with Forbes subscription I’m sure you can find it based on topic and having date written-below is a quote from that article):

“A federal judge on Monday withdrew an order challenging U.S. Attorney David Dugas for not intervening in a whistleblowers’ lawsuit that accuses insurance companies of overbilling the federal government for flood damage from Hurricane Katrina.”

Here’s another article..sounds like the 2 folks who commented on the article are ready to shout “guilty” against the insurance industry as they have no understanding of the NFIP directives to carriers:

Now here’s some of the best info I’ve seen on the whistleblower case and what happened  explaining it all with links to the US attorney’s brief and the original request..very interesting:

Here is the US Attorney’s brief filed Friday:

Homeland Security Report- 18 pages worth reading- their survey and findings on the files. Make sure to note that this says they have subpeoned the wind files from the WYO carriers:

Here is Branch’s response to the court on IG brief filed:

Links to various states whistleblower acts on False Claims Act- I didn’t realize they varied by states- some allow only for False claims involving health issues- anyway- here is the state by state guidelines:

And here is other information on the False Claims Act in general:

That’s the entire history of articles I had on this case. I will post the pdf document for the dismissal as soon as it’s located. This is an important case for adjusters to study and learn from.  I hate to think of the dollars wasted on E and O and other defense costs involved by the adjusters, adjusting firms, and carriers who had been named in the suit. No one in the claims industry including policyholders had anything to gain on this case as the expense all results in higher premiums for us all down the road. Make sure you read what these whistleblowers stood to gain in the links provided above. The hard part is to know the adjusters  making the allegations were anonymous and still out there working for carriers and/or adjusting firms. Cases like this cost all independents jobs…..we’ve all watched as carriers have increased their numbers of staff adjusters since this case and the Rigsby/Renfroe/State Farm case also involved independent adjusters.

The initial news article posted at the top of this blog addresses the possibilty of an appeal so this may not be over yet. After 30 years in the property claims business, I find it very tough to believe the allegations in this case but by viewing all information posted publicly on the case, I’m trying to learn both sides of the issue and hope that you will also by viewing all information available to us  like that found in the links above. I would imagine I’ll have lots of supplemental comments to this blog as new information becomes available this week.


**Update 10/18- I knew David Rossmiller of the Insurance Coverage blog would come through with an update on this. Here is today’s entry which ties all of this together for us and also mentions the connection with this case and the Rigsby whistleblower case:

Also, Dr Michael Birzon of the University of Central FL wrote the following blog last night found here:

I’ll continue to update this throughout the day if any significant new things are learned. We only have 1 of the 4 adjuster’s names thus far and if I find the other 3 I’ll post it immediately.